A Comparative Analysis of The Constitutional Status of Double Jeopardy

Author: Sathyanarayanaswamy c, Legal Associate at Pristine councilor’s, Advocates & Solicitors. New Delhi, India. &
Prerana, Legal Associate at Tharanath Poojary Associates, Bangalore, India. [Page:231-240]

KEYWORDS: Double Jeopardy, Constitutional Protection, Article 20(2), Criminal Justice System, Comparative Legal Analysis.

ABSTRACT

The paper Along with a comparative examination, delves deeply into the issue of “double jeopardy.” Although the concept of double jeopardy has a common origin and is thought to have originated from the Roman and Greek eras or from their laws that protected individuals from double jeopardy3 , the way the doctrine’s principles are applied or carried out varies from one nation to the next. In order to comprehend and analyse the topic, the research has reviewed numerous cases pertaining to the concept countries. The paper begins with an introduction to the Double Jeopardy concept as it pertains to India, under constitution and then goes on to discuss the concept and its significance in other countries. The goal of the study is to determine how Double Jeopardy differs in significance and meaning in India compared to other nations

LexLumen – Open Access Box
LLRJ | Lex Lumen Research Journal Open Access Article
Open Access Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence, which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

CC
BY
NC
SA
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · Free to read, share & adapt
Non-commercial use · Attribution required

Access Open Access
Copyright © LLRJ 2024–2026
Licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Estd. 2024