PEER-REVIEW POLICY:

Lex Lumen Research Journal is committed to ensuring a rigorous and ethical peer review process to uphold the quality and integrity of the research it publishes. Our Double-Blind peer review policy is designed to provide an unbiased, transparent, and efficient assessment of submitted manuscripts

Lex Lumen Research Journal follows a double-blind peer review process: 

The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process. 

-Our Peer-Review policy aligns with the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers

Which ensures impartial and unbiased feedback, focusing solely on the manuscript’s academic merit, originality, and relevance. 

RE-SUBMISSION REVIEW:

Lex Lumen Research Journal (LLRJ) permits only one (1) re-submission of a manuscript, subject to the conditions mentioned below:

  1. Permissible Grounds for Re-submission
    Re-submission is allowed only in cases involving:
  • Grammatical or language errors
  • Errors in references, citations, or formatting
  • Minor editorial corrections suggested by reviewers
  1. Non-Permissible Grounds: Substantive changes to research content, methodology, or results are not permitted at the re-submission stage.
  2. Plagiarism & AI Policy: Any manuscript rejected due to plagiarism or unethical use of AI tools is strictly barred from re-submission under any circumstances.
  3. Final Decision: The editorial decision after re-submission shall be final and binding.