PEER-REVIEW POLICY:
Lex Lumen Research Journal is committed to ensuring a rigorous and ethical peer review process to uphold the quality and integrity of the research it publishes. Our Double-Blind peer review policy is designed to provide an unbiased, transparent, and efficient assessment of submitted manuscripts
Lex Lumen Research Journal follows a double-blind peer review process:
– The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.
-Our Peer-Review policy aligns with the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers
Which ensures impartial and unbiased feedback, focusing solely on the manuscript’s academic merit, originality, and relevance.
RE-SUBMISSION REVIEW:
Lex Lumen Research Journal (LLRJ) permits only one (1) re-submission of a manuscript, subject to the conditions mentioned below:
- Permissible Grounds for Re-submission
Re-submission is allowed only in cases involving:
- Grammatical or language errors
- Errors in references, citations, or formatting
- Minor editorial corrections suggested by reviewers
- Non-Permissible Grounds: Substantive changes to research content, methodology, or results are not permitted at the re-submission stage.
- Plagiarism & AI Policy: Any manuscript rejected due to plagiarism or unethical use of AI tools is strictly barred from re-submission under any circumstances.
- Final Decision: The editorial decision after re-submission shall be final and binding.


