The Modesty Paradox: Deconstructing The Patriarchal Framework Of Section 79 BNS

Author: Kanishka Panwar, Intern, Lex Lumen Research Journal. [Pages:13-27]

KEYWORDS: Section 79 BNS, Section 509 IPC, outraging modesty, judicial interpretation, gender-neutrality, feminist legal theory, sexual harassment, legal reform.

ABSTRACT

This article critically examines Section 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita2 , 2023 (formerly Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code3 ), which criminalizes acts intended to insult the modesty of women. Through a doctrinal analysis of statutory provisions and judicial precedents, it identifies three core flaws in India’s sexual harassment jurisprudence. First, the BNS continues to rely on the term “modesty”, an undefined concept rooted in Victorian notions of feminine chastity, creating ambiguity. Second, the gender-specific nature of the provision violates constitutional equality by excluding men, transgender persons, and LGBTQ+ individuals from protection. Third, the morality-based framework dilutes harassment’s reality, framing it as a violation to honour rather than violation of bodily autonomy. This research proposes a paradigm shift towards a dignity and bodily integrity-based framework grounded in Article 21. It advocates for gender-neutral protection that places individual autonomy and human dignity at the core, addressing sexual harassment as a human rights violation rather than a moral transgression.

LexLumen – Open Access Box
LLRJ | Lex Lumen Research Journal Open Access Article
Open Access Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence, which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

CC
BY
NC
SA
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · Free to read, share & adapt
Non-commercial use · Attribution required

Access Open Access
Copyright © LLRJ 2024–2026
Licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Estd. 2024